By admin 
“We’re shut down due to testing outcomes displaying DEAD VIRUS PIECES in just a few of our samples. Nothing alive,” McAfee said, even when testing for keep virus stays to be pending. “We’re testing and might have additional info shortly,” he added.
One different doc McAfee despatched was an analysis from Margaret E. (Peg) Coleman, a microbiologist and raw milk advocate, who argues, amongst completely different points, that there is a lack of proof of milk-borne transmission of rooster flu viruses, significantly extreme pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAI). That options H5N1, an HPAI that is at current inflicting an unprecedented nationwide outbreak in US dairy cattle.
Human infections
On this stage, Coleman just isn’t fallacious. The outbreak of H5N1, which was declared in March, is the first time an HPAI has been detected in US cows. And the outbreak has been like no completely different seen anyplace on the earth sooner than. As such, there are quite a few questions and unknowns in regards to the hazard the dairy outbreak poses to individuals, along with whether or not or not of us is perhaps contaminated with the virus by ingesting extreme ranges of it in milk.
So far, no human infections have been linked to Raw Farm’s raw milk.
Nonetheless, real-world proof from H5N1 infections in dairy workers strongly signifies that people can turn into contaminated from milk. So far, as a minimum 34 dairy workers throughout the US have developed H5N1 infections after working with contaminated cows. The staff’ infections are largely thought to occur by the use of milk, along with from having milk splashed of their eyes or touching their faces with milk-contaminated fingers. One of many important frequent indicators amongst dairy workers is conjunctivitis, aka pink eye.
In its alert remaining week, the California effectively being division warned that whereas pasteurization efficiently kills rooster flu, raw milk clients are liable to the virus, writing: